All posts by Chris Faulkner Gibson

Successful demonstration

Demo 3We mounted a succesful demonstration on Tuesday outside the Passenger Shed at Temple Meads (City Hall is being refurbished) as a full meeting of Bristol City Council was being held. We also made 3  statements to the Council, raising awareness of our campaign amongst the Councillors: many of whom have confirmed their support for us. See gallery  for more pics.

Emma Collins gave the general context of our case and spoke from the heart about her feelings towards  the development.

After some confusion caused by the Lord Mayor changing the running order – and outspoken demands from our Ward Councillors that we be allowed to speak – Gareth Edwards gave a knowledgable summary of the key landscape and open space issues, followed by Chris Faulkner Gibson who made a plea for the protection of all designated green open space in Bristol.

You can read the statements here: Emma Collins 21 July Statement F1501870 , Gareth Edwards 21 July Council Meeting Heritage statement , Chris Faulkner Gibson Statement Green Open Space

You can watch the presentations here: and here

We will be demonstrating outside when the Planning Committee meetto decide this application and will publish details here and on Facebook as soon as they are known.

Share This

Public Demonstration 21st July

Please come and join us for a peaceful expression of our determination to protect this and other threatened green open space.

We will be demonstrating outside the next full Bristol City Council , which is being held in The Passenger Shed at Temple Meads (as City Hall is being refurbished).

The main meeting starts at 6.00pm and Councillors tend to arrive around 5.00pm. However there is a ceremony appointing Aldermen that starts at 4.00pm and many Councillors are likely to attend.

We want as many people as we can muster to gather outside the Shed from 4.00pm onwards and then to go into the chamber for when we present statements to the meeting.

Share This

E-petition Now Live

Please sign our online petition.

We are supporting the CPRE campaign to get Bristol City Council to prioritise brownfield sites and protect green open space. Please support this by signing. Together we can influence Council Policy and protect our much loved open spaces from inappropriate development.

Alternatively, you can print the petition text  Petition Final (3137) and signature sheets Petition Names Sheet (3137). Please return signatures to the address shown.

However, please don’t forget it’s also vital to submit an objection – see here for details.
Share This


BREAKING BADGER NEWS: on Saturday 2nd May, badger hair was found on the fence just a few feet from what local residents have long known to be an active badger sett, but which the developers have described (wrongly in our opinion) as a ‘disused fox den’. The hairs have been compared to photographed examples and descriptions on the internet, and we are in no doubt whatsoever that it is indeed badger and not fox or dog hair. Badger poo (also photographed) has also been found this weekend very close by in what appears to be territory marking, as it was not in a typical badger ‘latrine’. Some of the hair has of course been retained for expert analysis.
In addition to the sightings and video evidence of badgers in the vicinity in recent weeks, we believe all this provides further evidence that the sett is indeed live and any works in the field within 20m of it must only be carried out under licence from Natural England. We remain of the opinion that the previous clearance work and apparent damage to the sett was in breach of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992.
The developers have been advised, but just in case any work, (such as test drilling for the ground condition report needed for the planning application) might be attempted, we are asking everyone to be vigilant. This latest evidence is also being reported to the Police.

Guidance on contacting the Police can be found on their website. None of us are in a position to give definitive advice, but the Police can be contacted on 101 for all non-emergency matters, online at or on 999 if the crime is in progress. The police control centre may well decide the call does not warrant a 999 response, but the initial advice is to call 999 if you believe the crime is actually in progress. The above web address gives advice on whether to use 999 or 101, but does not specifically address wildlife crime.

Photographing the badger hair - public footpath behind Welsford & Rowland Avenue. Badger Hair May 2015 - 3 Badger Hair May 2015

Share This

Last chance to see this field in glorious late spring sunshine?

URL=/groups/savefromevalleyatstapleton/?_fb_noscript=1″ />Beth White, who took this lovely photo, said ‘Lush green field or yet ANOTHER housing estate ?? I know what I’d prefer’. A sentiment we’d all echo. Campaign details in Protect Frome Valley – FAQ’s 1

See our Facebook page for more – and please feel free to join us if you want to save this green open space for future generations.

Share This


A Bristol Post article claiming our fears had been ‘allayed’ by the developers was greeted with anger by everyone who read it. Read the article, and then scroll down for our response, also published on the Bristol Post website.

‘A BRISTOL private school and developer have moved to allay residents’ fears over plans to create homes on a playing field they claim is a floodplain and wildlife habitat. People living close to Colston’s School in Stapleton have raised objections to proposals to build 12 luxury houses on part of the school’s playing field off Welsford Avenue.

At a public meeting last month, residents said the field was home to a vast array of wildlife including bats, badgers and kingfishers. They announced their intention to apply to have the land registered as a town green, which, if approved, could render it off limits for developers.

Campaigners have set up a group called the Protect Frome Valley at Stapleton Community Association to battle the plans. Chris Gibson, the association’s campaign organiser, told the gathering of 50 locals that the field was part of a conservation area and designated important open space, as well as being a flood plain which had been submerged in recent years. 

But the school and Bristol-based developer Woodstock Homes have now addressed residents’ worries. They say the site is located in the Environment Agency’s Flood Zone 1, which is at the lowest risk of flooding and “perfectly acceptable” for development. Despite the low risk, the homes have been moved up the slope away from the flood plain on the plans. The school and housebuilder say professional ecologists have surveyed the site and do not believe there to be an active badger sett on the field, as suggested at the meeting. They say a full ecological survey will be submitted with any planning application.

Jeremy McCullough, head master at Colston’s School, said: “We are very sensitive to the views of the local community and particularly those living in the vicinity of the proposed development site. The school has always sought to maintain good and positive relationships with its neighbouring residents, and the current project is no exception. It was partly for this reason that Woodstock Homes was selected as the preferred developer. We have been impressed by the quality of their housing schemes to date, and the sensitivity of those schemes to their location.”

Woodstock Homes’ managing director Martin Newman said: “While new housing proposals often concern local residents, Bristol still needs more homes. This could mean more city centre developments, it may even mean greenbelt development. But it is certainly important to build new homes within existing communities. We believe this is a good place to build new, quality homes.
“We will do our very best to minimise the impact on the existing residents and will try and take on board any concerns.”
Read more:

Our response:

‘On behalf of the ‘Protect Frome Valley @ Stapleton’ Community Association I wish to make it absolutely clear that we have not, in any sense, had any ‘fears allayed’ by the developers. We do not accept the assertions made in the statements you have reported in this article and we will be issuing a full press release in due course.

We note that the developers have not addressed any of the actual planning issues, including the land’s official planning designations of ‘Important Open Space’, ‘Historic Park & Garden’ and ‘Conservation Area’.

We dispute their assertions regarding wildlife habitat, and note they originally described the location as ‘unused wasteland’, betraying a woeful lack of understanding and respect for the environment and local wildlife.

Long standing residents remain adamant that a badger sett has existed on the site for many years, and we still believe that an offence under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 may have been committed by clearing the land without a licence.

We reject the developer’s attempt to justify the the proposals on the grounds that Bristol needs more homes: we also recognise this need but do not accept that valuable public amenities such as this should be sacrificed for luxury housing being built purely for profit. The Bristol Local Plan identifies over 670 new homes within a 2-mile radius of this site, none of which are on green open space.

We dispute the assertion that the land is entirely Floodzone 1 and note that when we first raised this issue the developers appeared totally unaware that any of the land flooded.

We totally reject the frankly ludicrous and patronising assertions that the school is seeking to maintain ‘good and positive’ relations with its neighbours, and would point out that this has provoked such anger that, sadly, the relationship with Colston’s School may have been irreparably damaged.

Nor do we accept the fatuous statement that this is a good place to build because it is within a community. We remain of the opinion that this development is wrong in principle, and is an example of the insidious urban creep that threatens all our open spaces.

If allowed, this will make a mockery of all protective planning designations in Bristol, and we remain resolute in our determination to fight it – statements of the kind being made in this article only serve to fuel that determination.

Christopher Faulkner Gibson, ‘Protect Frome Valley @ Stapleton’ Community Association’

Share This

Visual Impact

Development site from south side of lakeDevelopment site from Everest Road

Click on the pictures to enlarge. The red dots in these two photos show the proposed development site. One is taken from the south bank of Eastville Park Lake, the other from further up the slope below Everest Road on the Fishponds side of the Frome Valley.

The degree to which this development would intrude into the setting of the landscape can be clearly appreciated from these photos.

Share This